49News Object ( [newsid] => 49 [pubdate] => 2012-05-17 00:00:00 [title] => Online purchase of Fishing and Hunting licences [description] => A number of operators have recently been in touch with us with question and concerns around the new MNR License Automation System. For many operators, the MNR license website is an easy alternative. [link] => /online-purchase-of-fishing-and-hunting-licences [content] =>
![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

[author] => NOTO [feedback:protected] => Array ( ) ) News Object ( [newsid] => 37 [pubdate] => 2011-11-25 00:00:00 [title] => Five New Directors on the NOTO Board [description] => The five new directors are; Jocelyn Filippini (Allied members president), Peter Spanyi (Allied Vice President), Brenda Baughman (North West Director - Bow Narrow Camp), Cindy Lebrun (North Central Director – Tatnall Camp) and Bruce Wilkins (North East Director – Golden Eagle Camp and Outfitting). [link] => /five-new-directors-on-the-noto-board [content] =>
![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

[author] => NOTO [feedback:protected] => Array ( ) ) News Object ( [newsid] => 33 [pubdate] => 2011-10-31 00:00:00 [title] => ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE - Helping You Comply and Achieve Accessible Service Excellence [description] => The Ontarians with Disability Act 2005 stipulates that all businesses in Ontario confirm to the Accessibility Standards for customer service by January 1, 2012. [link] => /accessibility-standards-for-customer-service-helping-you-comply-and-achieve-accessible-service-excellence [content] =>
![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]() NORTHERN ONTARIO TOURISM MARKETING STRATEGY 2012-2017 The Northern Ontario Tourism Marketing Strategy 2012-2017 has been concluded and presented to the executive of the Regional Tourism Organization 13 (RTO13). The document has been received and accepted and the RTO executive has indicated that they support the recommendations and direction of the strategy with the exception of what is detailed in an RTO document captioned ‘Response to the Consultants Report and Implementation Direction.’ The strategy looked to build on the success of the existing Northern strategy to ‘retool, refresh and reposition’ the marketing approach for the next five years. It is expected that stakeholders would use the strategy as a framework when planning and funding marketing efforts. The new strategy was prepared by Erin Mitchell of Mitchell Westlake. The consultant was engaged by RTO13 in partnership with the Northern office of the Ontario Tourism Marketing Partnership Corporation (OTMPC). The strategy was developed through a four phased methodology that reviewed and assessed the existing Northern Strategy, examined the mandates and organizational structures of stakeholders in order to address roles and responsibilities for all levels of marketing efforts, tourism stakeholders were engaged and a five year strategy was developed. The strategy addressed among other things; financial resource allocations, markets, tactical strategies and research and measurements. Both the ‘Response to the Consultants Report and Implementation Direction’ and the Northern Ontario Tourism Marketing Strategy 2012-2017, can be accessed and downloaded from the RTO 13 website. The links are: ‘Response to the Consultants Report and Implementation Direction’ and the Northern Ontario Tourism Marketing Strategy 2012-2017 . |

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]() Many tourism businesses with private drinking water systems have finally received their site visits from local health unit inspectors this season. This step marks the transition from the “old” drinking water regulations – what began as Reg. 252 under Ministry of Environment and morphed into Reg. 218 under the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Many businesses, especially those who did not have treatment systems in place, elected to post their systems as “Untested” and wait for the site inspection to decide on next steps. Posting was fully permitted under 252/318. That changes with the inspection, which places the facility fully under the authority of Reg. 319. The health inspector performs a “risk assessment” of the system and categorizes it as high, medium or low risk. The risk assessment will determine how often your water needs to be tested. Your track record of test results (if you have one) and your overall system, including documentation and procedures, will influence your risk assessment. A comprehensive overview of how the board of health was advised to issue directives is provided in the SMALL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS RISK ASSESSMENT DIRECTIVES GUIDENCE DOCUMENT. The other thing the inspector will do is provide you with a directive of any changes that are required to your system. Reg. 319 is much more open-ended and flexible than previous regulations. It does not automatically permit you to post as untreated/untested, for example, but it does not prohibit posting either. If you do not agree with the approach suggested in the directive, you can appeal it to the local Medical Officer of Health. You have only 7 days to submit your appeal, so time is of the essence. Your system is expected to comply with accepted standards, so it is unlikely that an appeal would be granted for a non-compliant system. However, there is room for discussion on whether your distribution system requires chlorination, since the guidelines are somewhat open on the minimum number of connections that defines a distribution system that needs chlorine. Another area for discussion is posting vs. treatment. If you make the case that health is better protected by posting, posting is permitted. For example, a facility on generator that has regular power failures or fluctuations might provide less predictable water safety than a notice by the sink to boil the water before use. If that is the alternative you wish, you need to make your case in appealing the directive. We need to know what you are hearing from your local health inspector so we can share your experience with others and provide you with specific advice. Please contact us directly or post your experience to the discussion board. The flexibility in the new regulation is bound to create a certain amount of confusion, but sharing our experiences will go a long way to provide direction to the industry. |

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
Crown Land Use Atlas Harmonization Project (CLUAH) - WAWA District Public open houses are now underway for the Wawa Crown Land Use Atlas Harmonization project and comments will be received on the Environmental Registry until September 1. I urge all tourist operators in the Wawa district to attend an information session if possible, and submit comments to the ER. For tourist operators outside of the Wawa district it is very important to understand this process and post your comments on the registry...ALL OPERATORS IN THE PROVINCE CAN MAKE AN INPUT!! This project is the first attempt to update land use in the district since the District Land Use Guidelines were developed in the early 1980s and may very well set the stage for the next 30 years. Land use decisions made as a result of forest management planning have long been contentious in this district, with numerous environmental “bump ups” in the last few years. The information on the ER is somewhat confusing – the current proposed options are not in the main body of the page, but in links on the right side at the bottom. It consists of two maps that describe four options. It is very important to read the detailed management descriptions, since three of the four options refer to the same map. Option A was prepared mainly by local pro roads interests and is focused on enhancing road based opportunities. It has a Road Based Recreation Enhanced Management Area along with General Use Areas and is shown here: Options B, C, and D have a similar Road Based Recreation EMA and General Use Areas but add Remote Access Enhanced Management Areas. These options are shown on this map: They differ from one another in the specific management prescriptions – which activities are permitted or prohibited. For example, Options B and C permit continued motorized use of existing forest roads but not new roads. Option D affects both new and existing roads, making the area “functionally roadless”. The management prescriptions for all options are outlined in this document: It is this item that I urge you to read carefully and comment on in detail. Which elements make sense and which do not? How will this affect the future of your business? Which approaches have struck an appropriate balance between the needs of our industry and the needs of local recreational communities? If you need more information, please call the NOTO office or the MNR District office in Wawa. Your comments matter and will be very important in determining the final direction of this important land use planning initiative. |

[author] => Doug Reynolds [feedback:protected] => Array ( ) ) News Object ( [newsid] => 6 [pubdate] => 2011-07-21 00:00:00 [title] => Allied Spotlight - Yamaha Motor Canada [description] => When it comes to building fast, powerful and long lasting outboards, nobody does it better than Yamaha. [link] => /allied-spotlight-yamaha-motor-canada [content] =>
![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

![]()
|

The NOTO office continues to receive more calls than ever from guests who are concerned that they may have problems entering Canada due to an old criminal record for offenses such as DUI. A number of operators are actively informing guest about this issue and urging them to call the NOTO office with any questions or for help with the process of applying for rehabilitation. This advice is a FREE service that NOTO provides to your guests – they do not need to pay nearly $1,000 to an "immigration consultant"!
What if a guest has a trip planned but has just discovered that they have a problem? Although the rehabilitation process often takes 4 to 6 months, all may not be lost. If they have a rehabilitation application in the system, they can still request a Temporary Residency Permit in order to complete their trip. Although this will cost them an additional $200, many guests we have spoken with are very thankful that there is a possibility of saving a planned vacation.
We also get calls from operators regarding guests who feel they were treated badly or turned back illegitimately by border officials. We urge those guests to raise their concerns directly with CBSA via their website http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/contact/com-eng.html These concerns will be followed up by officials, usually in the form of a direct phone call to the guest. This process also makes sure that complaints or comments make it into CBSA statistics.
Since I am currently leading this initiative in the NOTO office, please have your guests contact me directly by phone or email me so we can arrange a convenient time to talk about their issue and steps they can take to clear up their problem. I'll make sure they have the necessary information and correct point of contact so their application for rehabilitation goes as smoothly as possible.
Of the many calls we have receive this winter and spring – often 5 or 6 a day – the vast majority find a solution to their issue and are able to continue a planned trip. We can't help your guests if we don't hear from them, so please use any opportunity you have to let us help them cross the border and visit northern Ontario.
Doug Reynolds,
NOTO Executive Director
T: 705-472-5552 ext. 23 F: 705-472-0621 E: doug@noto.net
[author] => Doug Reynolds [feedback:protected] => Array ( ) )